Access Keys:
Skip navigation (Access Key - S)
Home page (Access Key - 1)
Site map (Access Key - 3)
Search (Access Key - 4)
Terms and conditions (Access Key - 8)
Feedback form (Access Key - 9)
Access key details (Access Key - 0)

MINUTES OF THE BOARD MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY, 15 SEPTEMBER 2005 AT RENAISSANCE HOUSE, WARRINGTON

Present: 
Bryan Gray (Chairman)
David Brockbank
Joseph Dwek
Sir Martin Harris
Peter Hensman
Robert Johnston
Dave McCall
John Moverley
Marie Rimmer
Anil Ruia
Mike Storey
Maureen Williams

Also Present: 
Steven Broomhead
Bernice Law (Secretary)
David Higham (GONW)
Ian Haythornthwaite (71/10)
George Baxter (71/00)
Mark Hughes (71/00)(71/06)
 
71/00 PRESENTATION: NUCLEAR DECOMMISSIONING AUTHORITY
The Board received a presentation from Sir Anthony Cleaver, Chairman and Ian Hudson, Head of Technology and Skills Development of the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority.

Sir Anthony reminded the Board that the Nuclear Decommissioning Authority (NDA) had been operational since 1 April 2005, with the responsibility for cleaning up the nuclear industry.  It has an annual budget of £2bn and employs around 140 staff at the moment but expects this to rise to 180.  The Authority is based in West Cumbria, with four regional sites covering twenty nuclear sites in the UK.  Sir Anthony ran through the statutory duties of the NDA to:

  • Ensure the nuclear legacy is dealt with safely, securely and with care for the environment in accordance with Government policy
  • Promote competition
  • Carry out research related to decommissioning skills
  • Promote best practice and secure value for money
  • Give support to the social and economic life of communities.

Sir Anthony also advised the Board of the NDA’s achievements to date, which are:

  • Standardised process for all site plans
  • Contracts negotiated
  • Annual Plan, Report and Accounts published
  • Supply chain relationships being developed
  • Site and National Stakeholder Group established
  • Draft strategy issued.

The Board were asked to respond to the NDA draft Strategy.  Sir Anthony said it would be helpful to know areas within the document, which the Agency supports as well as areas the Agency would like to comment on.Ian Hudson emphasised the need to understand the industry’s skill needs and to work with appropriate partners to ensure the skills needed are identified and delivered.

A collective RDA response would be provided on the NDA Strategy, however it was agreed that NWDA would also provide its own response.  Bernice Law would ensure that the NWDA response was communicated to the NDA within the required deadline.

71/01 INTRODUCTION AND APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE
Apologies were received from Pauleen Lane, Brenda Smith and John Merry.

71/02 MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 8 JULY 2005
These were approved as a correct record.
 
71/03 ACTION POINTS FROM LAST MEETING AND MATTERS ARISING 
The Board noted the Action Points from previous meetings.

ITEMS WHICH REQUIRE A DECISION
 
71/04 PROPERTY MANAGEMENT STRATEGY
The Board considered a report on the Property Management Strategy for the Agency to establish a Public, Private Sector Partnership under Section 5(2)c of the RDA Act.

The Board had appointed a Task and Finish Group of Board Members to review this proposal and noted the excellent work that had been undertaken by this Group.  The areas that had been considered were outlined in the report and the Board were informed of the Task and Finish Group’s recommendations. 

It was agreed that the Board approve the establishment of a Public, Private Partnership (PPP) as the basis of the Agency’s Property Strategy, subject to DTI and HM Treasury approval.

71/05 SCIENCE STRATEGY 
The Board received a Discussion Paper on the North West Science priorities and strategy.

The Board felt the discussion was timely given the context of the RES Review, together with ongoing reviews of business support and cluster policy.  The Board noted the North West Science strengths and the areas for ongoing NWDA support.

The Board emphasised its commitment towards targeting NWDA investment into fewer actions with greater impact.The Board considered existing priorities and discussed the North West’s strengths and challenges on science in the context of Central Government’s views.

In looking at the broad principles for NWDA involvement in science investment in the future, the Board emphasised that projects should be internationally competitive and should encourage industry to work with sources of knowledge e.g. HEI’s.

The Board asked the Director of Enterprise, Innovation and Skills to take the comments made at this meeting into account when working up the Regional Science Strategy.

71/06 PRESENTATION ON BUSINESS LINK REVIEW
The Board received a presentation from Mark Hughes, Executive Director of Enterprise, Innovation and Skills on the Business Link Review, which outlined the scope and timetable for the Study.  It was programmed that the Review would produce options and a recommended way forward by the end of December 2005.  The Board asked to be kept fully informed as the process proceeded.

71/07 CUMBRIA ISSUES:
The Board discussion took place on the following issues in Cumbria:

  • NW Nuclear Strategy
  • National Nuclear Skills Academy
  • National Nuclear Institute
  • National Nuclear Laboratories

The Board felt it was important that the region had a clear strategic approach to the North West’s Nuclear Sector as it was vital to set out clearly how the actions of a range of partners can act in a complementary way and in a coherent direction.

Sir Martin Harris gave the Board an update on his work and the recommendations to HEFC to establish a University of Cumbria.  The Board gave this proposal its full support.
 
71/08 FORMER RNAD BROUGHTON MOOR (DERWENT FOREST)
 
The Board were reminded of a discussion at its July meeting on a proposal for the remediation of Broughton Moor.  Following that meeting, a visit to the site had been undertaken. 

The visit by the Board members to the site gave the opportunity for a comprehensive review of the project, which raised a number of issues.

The Board agreed that Cumbria Vision was now best placed to review this scheme and its economic benefits and sustainability in the context of Vision’s emerging Business Plan for the sub region.

It was agreed that:

  1. Cumbria Vision undertakes to seek the full engagement of the private sector in any potential end use and report back to the Agency Board via the Urban Sub Committee on a regular basis
  2. The Agency would meet senior MOD officials to discuss the acquisition of the site and the provision of a dowry to take forward remediation work.

71/09 CHIEF EXECUTIVES REPORT
 
1 BBC Move to the North
 
The Chief Executive reported on a very positive meeting he had had with the BBC Director General on 23 August regarding the BBC’s proposed transfer of core activities to Manchester by 2010.  These proposals are to be considered by the BBC Governors on 20 October 2005.

The Chief Executive reported that the BBC was considering five location options within Manchester and Salford.  These included development of a “stand alone” BBC site or a more ambitious Media Enterprise Zone (MEZ).  The latter would provide a city region and regional focus for media, creative and IT related investment and bring significant jobs and GVA to the region.

The Chief Executive agreed to update the Board at the October meeting.
 
2 Carlisle Airport 
The Chief Executive gave feedback on the report commissioned from York Aviation on the economic and financial viability of the development of an airport at Carlisle.  Following receipt of the report, the Agency and Cumbria Vision had held a number of discussions with Lord Ballyedmond from Carlisle Airport and with the key partners, Carlisle City Council, Cumbria County Council and Scottish Enterprises.  It was noted that discussions are still ongoing.

3 2012 Olympics
The Chief Executive informed the Board that following the successful bid by London to host the 2012 Olympic Games, the North West region is scheduled to host part of the football tournament at Manchester United Old Trafford Ground.

The Board noted that the Agency had already outlined the potential benefits of the Games to the region in business opportunities, tourism and the potential to provide training and acclimatisation camps for athletes.  The Board were also aware of the need to explore the links between the Olympic Cultural Festival and Liverpool’s Capital of Culture status.

It was noted that a cross Agency group had been set up to explore these opportunities and that the Agency will be represented at a NW Olympic Steering Group convened by Sport England.
 
4 Regional Funding Allocations
The Board noted the Government’s recently produced indicative funding allocations across the areas of transport, housing and economic development.  These cover:

  • Regional transport funding allocations up to 2007/08 which are, for the first time, in line with the housing and economic development figures
  • indicative longer term planning assumptions for regional funding across the three funding streams beyond the current three years of the Spending Review.

The Chief Executive reported that the Government is inviting each region to give advice on its priorities in the three areas as an input to Government policy decision making in advance of the next budget.  Following discussions with GONW and NWRA, an agreed way forward has been found which is designed to produce integrated advice.  The RES Advisory Group, the Regional Housing Board and the Regional Transport Forum would carry out initial consideration for each of the three areas.  It was noted that the draft recommendations from these groups would be considered and co-ordinated by the Chief Executive of NWDA, GONW and NWRA.  An Executive Board comprising of representatives of the three bodies would agree final advice.

The Board were made aware that because of financial constraints and commitments, there is little scope for regional discretion in the early years of the process.  Increasingly, the Agency will have the opportunity to influence housing and transport investment in support of its objectives. 
 
5 Corporate Performance Update  
The Chief Executive reported on the Government Office Regional Directors’ Annual Report on the Agency’s performance in 2004/05 of “Good”.  The report commented that there had been considerable improvement upon last year’s performance and that there is clear evidence that the Agency is moving towards the “Excellent” grade.  The Chief Executive informed the Board that he felt the report was a fair and reasonable summary of the Agency’s performance in the past year.  The Board noted that an improvement plan, based on the report was being developed.

The Board also noted the survey of Stakeholders’ perceptions of the Agency’s performance. 

The Chief Executive reported that this was the last year that this approach to performance monitoring would take place.  This would be replaced by a system of self reporting by RDA’s with assessment by the National Audit Office based on the approach developed for the London Development Agency by the Audit Commission.

The Board noted the potential lines of enquiry, which were under review and the timetable for the NWDA’s assessment.

6 NHS Reconfiguration in the North West
 
The Chief Executive reported on a meeting with Chief Executives and Chairs of Strategic Health Authorities (SHA’s) that had taken place on 22 August 2005 as part of the RES consultation process.  The three SHA’s had welcomed the opportunity to contribute to the draft RES.

It was reported that the meeting gave the SHA’s the opportunity to inform the Agency of the future restructuring process of Primary Care Trusts (PCT’s) and SHA’s.  The Department of Health will be looking to reconfigure PCT’s to have clear relationships with Local Authority Social Services boundaries and for SHA’s to move towards alignment with Government Office boundaries. 

The Board noted that early indications for reconfiguration in the North West are three SHA’s into one regional structure and PCT’s to be reduced from 42 to approximately 22.

The Board noted the possible implications for the Agency.
 
71/10 FINANCE REPORT
The Board noted the report of the Director of Finance and Corporate Resources for the period to the end of July 2005.  The report summarised programme expenditure against budget and forecast for the year. 

The Board was informed that the Agency’s Efficiency Plan had been approved by the DTI.  The first quarter progress report was noted and the Board was informed that PriceWaterhouse Cooper had been appointed by DTI to measure the achievement of savings targets and would be reviewing the Agency performance at the end of the second quarter of the year.

The Agency’s progress on the production of an Assurance Framework was noted and the Board were informed this would be provided to the Audit Committee at its meeting in October 2005 for review.

The approved delegations for the period 25 July 2005 to 17 August 2005 were noted. 

The Board approved the single tender actions outlined in the report.
 
71/11 MINUTES FROM THE AUDIT COMMITTEE HELD ON 8 JULY 2005 
The Board noted the Minutes of the Audit Committee held on 8 July 2005.


71/12 MINUTES FROM THE ENVIRONMENT SUB COMMITTEE HELD ON 21 JUNE 2005
The Board noted the Minutes of the Environment Sub Committee held on 21 June 2005.

71/13 MINUTES FROM THE ENVIRONMENT SUB COMMITTEE HELD ON 21 JUNE 2005
The Board noted the Minutes of the Environment Sub Committee held on 21 June 2005.

71/14 MINUTES FROM THE RURAL REGENERATION SUB COMMITTEE HELD ON 12 AUGUST 2005
The Board noted the Minutes of the Rural Regeneration Sub Committee held on 12 August 2005.

71/15 BOARD MEMBERS FEEDBACK 
Maureen Williams reported on the proceedings of the Urban Sub Committee of 12 September.

DATE AND TIME OF THE NEXT BOARD MEETING
The next meeting will be at Renaissance House on 13 October 2005.
 
 The meeting finished at 14.00.

Investing in England's Northwest (link opens in a new window)