Access Keys:
Skip navigation (Access Key - S)
Home page (Access Key - 1)
Site map (Access Key - 3)
Search (Access Key - 4)
Terms and conditions (Access Key - 8)
Feedback form (Access Key - 9)
Access key details (Access Key - 0)

MINUTES OF THE BOARD MEETING HELD ON THURSDAY, 18 MAY 2006 AT BENTLEY MOTORS, CREWE, CHESHIRE

Present: 
Bryan Gray (Chairman)
David Brockbank
Joe Dwek
Sir Martin Harris
Peter Hensman
Dave McCall
Vanda Murray
Marie Rimmer
Anil Ruia
Brenda Smith
Mike Storey
Maureen Williams 

Also Present: 
Steven Broomhead
Bernice Law, Secretary
Ian Haythornthwaite 79/04,79/11
Fran Hulbert 79/00,79/05,79/09
Patrick White 79/05,79/08
Tim Sheward 79/08

79/00 PRESENTATION:  REGIONAL SKILLS PARTNERSHIP – PHIL LOWTHIAN, RSP SECRETARIAT

Phil Lowthian provided a presentation on the background to the establishment of the Regional Skills Partnerships; the context within which it worked (i.e. in terms of relationships with other partners and stakeholders); and achievements to date.

The future role of the RSP had been determined within three categories of activity:

  • Structural - The RSP needs to be aware of the changes taking place within LSCs, JC Plus and European Funding administration arrangements.
  • Tactical – the RSP recognised that it needed to:

o Develop better linkages to Local Authorities
o Challenge planning and funding partners
o Build and maintain partner momentum

  • Practical – The RSP would have an active role in the:

o Roll out of Sector Skills Agreements
o Skills Brokerage and Train to Gain programme
o Integration Brokerage and other Employer Services
o Impact through LAAs and LEGI
o L4/HE Pathfinder

79/01 INTRODUCTION AND APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE

Apologies were received from John Merry, John Moverley and Pauleen Lane.

79/02 MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 20 APRIL 2006

The minutes were approved as a correct record.

79/03 ACTION POINTS FROM LAST MEETING AND MATTERS ARISING 
 
The Board noted the progress made with regard to the action points from the previous meetings.

ITEMS FOR DECISION
 
79/04 FINANCIAL REGULATIONS AND SCHEME OF FINANCIAL AND BUSINESS DELEGATIONS.

The Board agreed the policy statement on Financial Delegations which had been designed to ensure:

  • Compliance with the Management Statement and Financial Memorandum, as issued by the Secretary of State;
  • Transparency of the delegations process;
  • That the financial responsibilities of the Accounting Officer could be appropriately discharged; and
  • That the day to day management of the Delegations process could be undertaken in an efficient and effective manner.

The Board approved the Agency’s Financial Regulations and Scheme of Financial and Business Delegations which would be applied to the conduct of all the Agency’s financial business.
 
The Board noted the summary of responsibilities and accountabilities; and also approved the specific schedule of financial and business delegations as outlined within the policy statement.
 
REGIONAL ECONOMIC STRATEGY

79/05 IMPLEMENTING THE RES AND PROGRESS ON THE SKILLS AND EDUCATION TRANSFORMATIONAL ACTIONS
 
The Board noted the progress made to date by the Agency and its partners to deliver the Skills and Education Transformational Actions contained within the RES; in particular the excellent progress made to establish the University for Cumbria, on which a full report would be presented to the June Board.

The Board requested that in future the report on Implementing the RES should be amended to pull out examples of project delivery and best practise and using the Traffic light scorecard show major issues and risks.

79/06 EU POLICY AND FUNDING: RESPONSE TO THE CONSULTATION ON THE DRAFT NATIONAL STRATEGIC REFERENCE FRAMEWORK
 
The Board noted that in February, the Government had issued a consultation document on the UK National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF), which relates to the use of structural fund programmes between 2007 and 2013.  The Board was advised that since the consultation document had been issued, the Agency had been working closely with the Regional Assembly and sub regional and local partners to develop a joint regional response.

The Board noted particularly that the proposal was for one single programme for the Region, within which a mechanism would be designed to ensure that RES and sub regional priorities were reflected. This would be particularly important in Merseyside where it was proposed there would be a ring fenced element within the regional programme.

The Board approved the draft response which included a number of high level recommendations as follows:

  • There was a need for a single regional programme, including a ring fenced component for Merseyside.
  • The RES should determine overall priorities for ERDF and ESF in the next programme and provide a substantial evidence base for programme development.
  • That the allocation methodology for ERDF and ESF should be informed by the PSA2 target for regional economic performance and that structural funds should be targeted at those regions with below average GVA.
  • That there should be a national top slice for Cumbria given that it was the only UK sub region in economic decline.
  • That there should be stronger recognition of the Northern Way.
  • There was a need to enhance the scope of the ESF component to include training above level 3 in line with the RSP priorities in the RES.
  • There was a need to ensure that ERDF and ESF were properly aligned at regional level to ensure appropriate linkages were made at regional and local levels.

ITEMS FOR INFORMATION
 
79/07 UPDATE ON SUB REGIONAL PARTNERSHIPS
 
The Board noted the progress made in respect of SRP planning and the steps which the SRP Steering Group had implemented to ensure that each SRP was clear on its role and responsibilities in relation to RES delivery; on the purpose of the Action plans; and that each Action Plan was fit for purpose. 

The Board also noted the key dates within the process, which were as follows:

 End July 2006  - SRP Action Plans would be submitted to NWDA
 End August 2006 - NWDA would complete its review of SRP Action Plans
 September 2006 - SRP Action Plans would be presented to the NWDA Board
 
The Board endorsed the policy statement in respect of SRPs which had been discussed at the SRP Sub Committee the previous day and sought to ensure that the Agency adequately supported the:

  • Development and delivery of the RES at sub regional and local level;
  • Alignment of SRPs/URCs
  • Development of the NWDA’s Strategic Investment Plan; and
  • The greater alignment of public sector funding around sub regional and regional economic priorities.

79/08 KEY SHORT TERM RISKS TO THE NORTHWEST ECONOMY

The Board noted the report which provided an initial assessment of the key risks to the region’s economy for the next year. 

The Board was advised that a list of high rated risks that fell under NWDA’s scope of responsibility had been established, based on work carried out by the Agency in conjunction with the GONW Resilience Team.  The Board acknowledged that the list, whilst extensive, was not exhaustive and that it was subject to change on an almost daily basis.

The Board also noted that as part of its ongoing relations with strategic companies, the Agency was in the process of preparing a confidential risk register of key businesses, which would feed into the high risk list.  More importantly, it would enable the Agency to prepare for imminent changes to the region’s economy and consequently develop appropriate policies and programmes to address the issues arising.  Regular updates of the risk register would take place as part of the RES monitoring process.

The Board requested that the top ten risks be identified and reported traffic light format to assist in highlighting key issues to its meeting in November 2006.

79/09 LSC RE-ORGANISATION

The Board noted the proposed changes to the Learning and Skills Council’s structure, which were a result of the Agenda for Change document that set out a programme of improvement for LSCs.  The Board also noted a number of other Government documents which would influence the relationship between RDAs, FE and the LSCs.

The Board received a summary report of proposals contained within the FE White Paper, which had been presented to RDA Chairs to inform their discussion with Ministers on the subject and which outlined the RDAs position and the actions required.

79/10 CHIEF EXECUTIVE’S REPORT

a) Vauxhall Motors   
The Board noted the situation at Vauxhall Motors which had recently received press coverage.  The Board was advised that for some time the Agency had been working with partners to develop contingency plans and that an operational group comprising representatives from NWDA, Jobcentre Plus, Business Link, CWEA, TMP, Mersey and Cheshire LSCs, and GONW had been established to address any implications.  NWDA was taking the lead on this matter.

The Chancellor of the Exchequer and Secretary of State for Trade and Industry had visited the Vauxhall site on 17 May, when the company announced a number of job losses at the factory.  The Chief Executive reported that he had also been in attendance at that visit.

b) Corporate Plan Update 
The Board noted the progress made with the “refreshed” Corporate Plan document:

  • The Regional Assembly had been consulted on the draft document and a response was expected by the end of May. 
  • Output targets had been submitted to DTI for final approval.

The Board also noted that the updated Corporate Plan would be distributed to SRPs to help them develop their final action plans.  The final draft of the Corporate Plan would be published in June when it would also be sent to DTI for information.

The Board was advised that in addition, the Agency was also preparing a summary Business Plan for 2006/07 which would also be published in June 2006.

c) Independent Performance Assessment (IPA) – Draft Report
The Board noted that on 2 May the Agency had received a first draft of NAO’s Independent Assessment of the Agency’s performance.  The final report would be published nationally early in June.  The Board welcomed the findings recorded in the draft report which indicated that overall the Agency was performing strongly.
 
d) Comprehensive Spending Review (CSR)
The Board noted that as part of CSR2007, HM Treasury would consider the RDA single programme as part of its review of economic development funding.  Consequently, by early June, RDAs were required to provide to HMT detailed analysis of their existing spend and potential for future efficiencies.  Discussions with Government would then take place in respect of future policy requirements particularly around how support can most effectively be provided to deliver each region’s RES. 

The Board noted that NWDA was chairing the collective RDA input into the process.  Also the NWDA Chief Executive was chairing the development of a report on the overall impact of RDAs over the last six years.
 
e) The Lyons Enquiry
The Board received a brief summary of the interim findings from Sir Michael Lyons independent inquiry into the present system of local government funding, including the reform of council tax.   The Board noted that the interim findings were an interesting development in advance of the Local Government White Paper which was due to be published in June 2006.  The Board was advised that Sir Michael Lyons would continue to review the funding and functions of local government to inform his final report which would be presented to Ministers in December 2006.

f) The Energy White Paper
The Board was reminded of the background to the Energy Review which was launched by the Government in January 2006.  The review had included a period of consultation which had concluded in April 2006; and to which the RDAs had provided a collective response.  The detailed response had addressed all the questions raised within the review and had highlighted where RDAs could contribute to UK national goals.  It also expressed support for a new nuclear bid and as a point of particular concern, had raised the UK’s lack of natural gas storage capacity.

The Board was advised that NWDA had agreed with SEEDA and SWERDA to produce a joint narrative and analysis which would set out the three RDAs’ commitment to a balanced energy base that will seek to address the economic imperatives around security of supply and the opportunities represented by new technology and innovation in energy generation.
 
The Board noted that the NW Energy Council had met on 26 April and considered the future direction of NWDA’s energy policy and priority areas for support.  The Council would now prepare recommendations for NWDA.

g) Market Survey of Companies Operating within the Renewable Energy Sector in England’s Northwest
The Board noted that Envirolink Northwest had recently published the results of a survey of the region’s renewable energy sub sector, which included companies that supplied products and services to the wind, solar, wave, tidal, hydro, landfill gas and biomass sectors.

The Board was advised that respondents to the survey were overwhelmingly optimistic about the future of the sector. (The majority of businesses included within the sector were SMEs.)  In response to the findings from the survey, Envirolink had confirmed its objectives for 2006/07 in order to support the sector, which the Board noted were to:

  • Help the region’s companies to supply parts, components and services into the renewables sector.
  • Attract inward investment.
  • Assist companies with commercialisation of new technologies.

h) State of the North West Economy: Long Term Forecasts and Sub Regional reports
The Board noted that on 5 May the Regional Economic Forecasting Panel had published its latest reports.  The reports had been agreed by the Panel at its January meeting, however publication had been delayed due to purdah. 

The Board also noted that the panel’s view of the region’s long term prospects remained the same as previously reported, i.e. that over the next 20 years the region’s economy was expected to grow more slowly than that of the UK by a margin of 03 percentage points.

The Board was advised that included in the May publication was a sub regional report which provided a compendium of statistics on the sub regions’ economy.

The Board agreed that the Regional Economic Forecasting Panel should review the Marketing process for the RES.

i) European Funding: New Assisted Map Post 2006
The Board was advised that in February the UK Government had issued its consultation document on the new assisted area map post 2006, which also included consultation on criteria to be used.  The Agency had taken the lead, in conjunction with the NWRA and Sub Regional Partners, to draw together the region’s response.

The Board noted that the region’s response argued for continued coverage within the NW region, based on the spatial targeting in the RES and the relative needs of the region; as well as a map that would be informed by regional and local coverage.
 
j)  Restructuring of the UK’s Police Force
The Chief Executive reported that further to his report in November, the Home Secretary had now taken advice from Her Majesty’s Inspectorate of Constabulary and concluded that there would be only one acceptable option for the restructuring of the NW Police Forces, which would be as follows:

  • Greater Manchester Police “Standalone”
  • Cheshire and Merseyside to merge.
  • Cumbria and Lancashire to merge.

Board Members were advised that Cheshire Police Authority had made representation against the decision.

The Board noted that under a joint arrangement with GONW, the Business Crime and Continuity Survey had been completed, which would be published later in the month and which sought to plug gaps in the evidence base across both resilience and business crime agendas; thus providing valuable data to support the delivery of the RES.   A pre release event had been held on 26 April.

The Board welcomed the Agency’s continuing support of the emerging private sector led Fraud Forum, which aimed to raise awareness of fraud and share information and best practice.

k) The Future of Regulation in the Public Sector 
The Board noted that on 3 April the Audit Commission had published this discussion document, which intended to contribute to the current debate about the scope and value of regulation.  The Audit Commission recognised that public service providers were moving from traditional roles (often as sole deliverers) to become commissioners, market creators and innovators. Given the changes in the Police Force, the Health Service and the Local Government review, the Audit Commission recognised that public services would look different in the future and therefore regulation would need to be different.

The Board noted that the Agency had been given the opportunity to comment on the discussion document.

l) Success at Work: Protecting Vulnerable Workers; Supporting Good Employers
The Board noted that in March, DTI published the Success at Work document which set out the Government’s measures to continue to meet the challenges presented by the global economy.  The Board was advised that the Government had an aspiration to achieve an 80% employment rate (the modern definition of full employment) which would require new opportunities to be developed for those people currently excluded from the employment market, as well as meeting the challenge of an ageing society.  The document set out a strategy to meet such challenges and proposed further extension of legal entitlements alongside measures to simplify and clarify laws to make it easier for employers to comply.

The Board welcomed the publication of the document which above all aimed to support and encourage good practice by employers, investors and trade unions to create high performing good workplaces and which clearly fit within the ethos of the RES and the Agency’s Business Link delivery proposals.

m) Organisational Review
The Board noted the progress made to implement the new organisational structure and the associated efficiency savings which would be made as a result. The Board requested regular updates on progress with the review.

n) Public Health Awards
The Board welcomed the news that the Agency had received an award in recognition for its contribution to the region’s health agenda, particularly in respect of the support it had provided to the NHS to tackle health improvement and reduce health inequalities, which the Board recognised was a key RES objective.

o) Local Elections 2006 / Changes in Government
The Board noted the results of the local elections which had taken place on 4 May and the changes to central Government Ministerial posts, which the Prime Minister had announced on 5 May.

79/11 FINANCE DIRECTORS REPORT

The Director of Finance and Corporate Resources provided an update on the Agency’s financial position leading up to year end.  The Board noted that NAO would commence its final audit on 12 June 2006 and was expected to conclude on 28 June. The Board requested that all staff involved in the year end procedures be thanked for their work.

The Board noted the approved delegations for the period 23 March 2006 to 13 April 2006.
 
79/12 CHAIRMAN’S REPORT

The Chairman reported that:

  • The meeting of RDA Chairs with The Prime Minister, Ruth Kelly and Margaret Hodge which had been very productive. The letter sent to Government following the meeting would be placed on the intranet for Board Members to review.
  • The BBC move to Greater Manchester was progressing well. The proposals had been sent to the Director General and would be considered by the Governors in mid June.

79/13 MINUTES OF THE ENVIRONMENT SUB COMMITTEE HELD ON 20 APRIL 2006.

The Board noted the minutes of the Environment Sub Committee Meeting held on 20 April 2006.

The Board were reminded of the plans for World Environment Day on June 5 2006.

79/14 MINUTES OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE HELD ON 20 APRIL 2006

The Board noted the minutes of the Audit Committee held on 20 April 2006.

79/15 MINUTES OF THE MARKETING, COMMUNICATIONS AND TOURISM SUB COMMITTEE HELD ON 20 APRIL 2006.

The Board noted the minutes of the Marketing, Communications and Tourism Sub Committee held on 20 April 2006.

78/14 MINUTES OF THE HEALTH AND SOCIAL INCLUSION SUB COMMITTEE MEETING HELD ON 21 APRIL 2006.

The Board noted the minutes of Health and Social Inclusion Sub Committee held on 21 April 2006.

78/15 DATE AND TIME OF NEXT MEETING

Investing in England's Northwest (link opens in a new window)