MINUTES OF THE BOARD MEETING HELD ON 18 OCTOBER 2007 AT
MICC, MANCHESTER
Present:
Bryan Gray (Chair)
Sir Martin Harris
Joe Dwek
Peter Hensman
Pauleen Lane
Dave McCall
John Moverley
Vanda Murray
Marie Rimmer
Anil Ruia
Brenda Smith
Mike Storey
Maureen Williams
Also Present:
Steven Broomhead, Chief Executive
Patrick White, Executive Director of Policy /Secretary
MarkHughes (94/04,94/05)
Ian Haythornthwaite (94/07)
94/01 INTRODUCTION, APOLOGIES FOR ABSENCE AND
DECLARATIONS OF INTEREST
Apologies were received from David Brockbank, John Merry and
Phil Robinson (NWRA).
94/02 MINUTES OF THE MEETING HELD ON 20 SEPTEMBER
2007 AND MATTERS ARISING
The minutes were approved as a correct record.
94/03 ACTION POINTS FROM PREVIOUS
MEETINGS
The Board noted the progress made on the action points from
previous meetings.
94/04 LIVERPOOL NHS BIOMEDICAL RESEARCH CENTRE
(BRC)
The Board was advised that the NHS Biomedical Research Centre
would create a unique facility in the UK that would deliver major
benefits to the region by:
- Creating the only Department of Health Centre for infectious
diseases in the UK; delivering a major component in sector support
infrastructure; and consolidating a major unique selling point for
the region, particularly Merseyside.
- Providing a national focus for research and securing long term
public and private funding traction.
- Forming an international beacon for inward investment and
R&D collaboration for industry.
The Board was advised that the BRC would provide a significant
opportunity for the North West region to establish itself as a
national leader in infectious diseases research.
- Agency investment would support the development of a
Bio-analytical facility; a Medical Microbiology Facility; a High
Throughput Screening Facility; and Health and Population Sciences
Space Rationalisation. It would also fund a BRC Business
Manager post.
The Board noted that the centre was expected to be completed and
launched by June 2009.
The Enterprise and Skills Sub Committee, at its meeting on 19
September 2007, had reviewed the project in detail and had
agreed to recommend Board approval of the proposed Agency
investment.
The Board approved Agency investment towards the project.
94/05 BUSINESS RESOURCE EFFICIENCY
PROJECT
The Board was advised that the Business Resource Efficiency
project aimed to improve the competitiveness and productivity of
the region’s companies by reducing their exposure to environmental
risk and improving their resource efficiency. The Board noted
that the project aimed to:
- Save businesses £50m pa, increase sales by £25m and safeguard a
further £55m sales.
- Reduce Carbon Dioxide emissions by 200,000 tonnes, reduce water
consumption by 1.3m cubic metres and reduce raw materials by
800,000 tonnes pa.
- Provide 2,800 North West businesses with environmental and
corporate responsibility support services over three
years.
- Provide 600 individuals with work based training.
The project would achieve this through providing environmental
advice and support to businesses; and specialist information
support. It would also provide flexible delivery capacity and
impact evaluation.
The Board noted that the project would be led by the existing
ENWORKS partnership. Delivery would be integrated within
Business Link Northwest.
The Board was advised that, over the next three financial years,
the project would: create 437 and safeguard 672 jobs; assist 2,800
businesses and provide work based training for 600 individuals.
Additional outputs would include:
• £50m cost savings.
• 800,000t raw material savings.
• 200,000t carbon dioxide savings.
• 1,300,000m3 water savings.
• £25M sales increased.
• £55M sales safeguarded.
The Board was advised that the Agency was being asked to provide
an investment over three years for the first phase of the
project. The Board noted that the project was expected to
lever appropriate funding from the EU Northwest Operational
Programme and support from national programmes such as Envirowise
and the Carbon Trust.
A second phase of the project would be developed, subject to the
completion of a successful evaluation of the project after the
first twelve months.
The Enterprise and Skills Sub Committee had reviewed the project
at its meeting on 19 September 2007 and had agreed to recommend
Board approval of the proposed Agency investment.
94/06 CHIEF EXECUTIVES REPORT
a) Media City: UK
Update
The Board received an update on the development of the Media
City:UK project. The Board noted that a stakeholder event would
take place on 20 November 2007 to present the shared vision and
begin the development of most of the support programme. The
Mediacity:UK Prospectus would be published shortly.
The Board also noted that the Managing Director of Mediacity
would be recruited by Peel Media during November and was expected
to be in post early in 2008.
b) NW ICT
Strategy
The Board was reminded of the successful outcomes from the previous
NW ICT Strategy, particularly in respect of the first generation
broadband coverage, which was now reaching 99.9% of businesses and
citizens in the region. There were still, however, a number
of barriers in place that were preventing businesses from fully
exploiting the capabilities of the available content and
applications. The Agency was currently revising the region’s ICT
Strategy to ensure that the remaining barriers were addressed.
The Board was advised that should ICT within the region be fully
optimised the potential impact for the NW economy would be a 3.7%
productivity increase that would equate to a £3.7bn uplift over a
five to seven year period. The private sector was fully
involved in the development of the Strategy.
The Board noted that subject to a detailed review and approval
by the Enterprise and Skills Sub Committee, the Strategy would be
officially launched in March 2008.
c) Select Committee on Education and Skills: Ninth
Report
The Chief Executive reported that in August 2007 the Education and
Skills Select Committee published its report on post 16 Skills, to
which he had provided evidence on behalf of all the RDAs.
The Board noted that the Committee had commended Government on
its sustained focus on Skills and agreed that it was vital that the
policy focus continued under new departmental
arrangements.
The Board noted the Committee’s findings which centred on:
- The need for a more coherent support to employers.
- The need for a comprehensive review and thorough analysis of
the current Skills infrastructure.
- The Train to Gain (TTG) programme - the Committee had received
evidence which had raised questions about the quality of provision;
and in some cases TTG appeared to be creating an extra unwelcome
layer.
The challenges that Sector Skills Councils were facing in terms
of representing the views and needs of very diverse sectors; and of
SMEs in particular. Some also appeared to have capacity issues.
The Board noted the Committee had recommended that Funding for
Skills “infrastructure” should be carefully targeted and that
Government and the LSC should make explicit the criteria by which
they assess the work of Train To Gain (TTG) brokers, as well as the
steps they are taking to achieve value for money.
The Chief Executive reminded the Board that in the North West,
TTG was delivered by Business Link NW; and that the NW was the only
region to deliver an integrated brokerage service. The Board noted
that for 2006/07, 91% of employers had confirmed their satisfaction
with the service.
The Board was also reminded that the Agency had been working
closely with the LSC to develop TTG as a holistic service that
would support businesses and increase productivity by addressing
the skills needs of their workforce; and that the service would be
responsive to employer needs across all skills levels. The
Board welcomed the fact that the Select Committee’s findings would
be used to inform the development of TTG for the future.
The Board also welcomed the news that as part of the
Comprehensive Spending Review announcement made on 9 October 2007,
the Chancellor had confirmed that from April 2009 RDAs would manage
the Skills Brokerage arrangement within an Integrated Business Link
Service. Appropriate resources would pass from the LSCs to
RDAs via the Single Pot.
d) Sainsbury Review of Science and
Innovation
The Board noted that on 5 October 2007 Lord Sainsbury had published
his review of the UK Science and Innovation system. The
review had examined how the role of science and innovation sought
to ensure that the UK remained competitive; and had concluded that
the UK was well placed to take advantage of the new markets opened
up by globalisation.
The Board noted that Government had accepted all the
recommendations from the review and welcomed the fact that the
report had been very positive about the role of RDAs. As a
result of the review RDAs were being asked to
- Concentrate on four areas of Innovation. (i.e. user driven
collaborative R&D, Knowledge Transfer, Clusters; and Start up
and Growth of new businesses).
- Collaborate with the Design Council to improve design in high
tech clusters.
The Board noted that within the report, there was a suggested
mechanism for RDAs to allocate spend against the Technology
Strategy Board’s priority areas. The Board agreed that this
would need some thought and consideration as well as some testing
in terms of the practicalities, budget implications; and timing;
and welcomed the fact that the Agency would work with RDA
colleagues to agree a consensus on the way forward.
The Board also noted that the report included specific case studies
on Manchester University’s success (particularly in respect of
RENOVO and Neu Tec) and Daresbury and its success as a model for
elsewhere.
e) Government’s Draft Legislative
Programme
The Chief Executive reported that on 8 October 2007 he had attended
an event at which Beverley Hughes in her capacity as Regional
Minister, presented for review the Government’s draft legislative
programme, which would be formally announced in the Queen’s Speech
in November.
The Board noted that the Programme contained at least 23 Bills,
of which the following were of particular relevance to RDAs:
• Climate Change;
• Education and Skills;
• Employment Simplification;
• Energy;
• Housing and Regeneration;
• Local Transport;
• Planning Reform; and
• Planning Gain Supplement.
The Board agreed that the event reinforced the Government’s
commitment to devolvement to the regions by allowing, for the first
time, discussion prior to the Queen’s Speech.
The Board noted that at the event, Beverley Hughes confirmed
that her driving theme was Partnership and that she wished to carry
out her role as Regional Minister in three ways:
- To act, within Whitehall, as an Ambassador for the North
West.
- To be central Government’s representative within the
region.
- To ensure that central Government is doing its best for the
region.
f) Comprehensive Spending Review
(CSR)
The Board noted the key measures relevant to RDAs that had been
included in the CSR announcement made on 9 October 2007. They
were as follows:
- That the RDA single programme budget would be £2,140m by
2010/11 from a base of £2,274m in 2007/08.
- Confirmation of the RDAs’ commitment to savings of £349m by
2010/11. HM Treasury had asked RDAs to keep an element of
this to fund new responsibilities.
- RDAs would take responsibility for a single brokerage service
for skills development and business support delivered through
Business Link.
- RDAs would also take responsibility for Economic impact of
major events (e.g. flooding) and SNR implementation (specifically
the new planning role).
g) Strategic Direction for Transport: Northern Way
Study into Transport Priorities
The Board noted that The Northern Way had recently published a
study into transport priorities which formed the basis of the
Northern Way’s submission for consideration by Government as part
of its Comprehensive Spending Review. The study stated that
there was a compelling case for a “northern cross rail” to connect
Leeds, Manchester and other northern cities. It also proposed
that the congested Manchester hub should be tackled as it was
constraining the transport system in the north and beyond.
Overall the study defined a strategic direction for transport in
the North to support productivity.
The Board was advised that the Study looked ahead over the next
twenty to thirty years; and that Northern Way was seeking to secure
Government commitment to the proposed investment through CSR and
beyond. The Northern Way acknowledged that the planning
process was such that it was likely to be at least ten years before
anything transformational could occur. However the view was
that in the interim, there were plenty of opportunities to achieve
visible and worthwhile progress; and the study advised that work
necessary to deliver the longer term priorities and improvements
should not be delayed.
The Board noted that from the Northern Way Growth Fund had
already been used to facilitate and foster partnership working
across the North, but given that the Fund would come to an end in
March 2008, the Study called for successor funding to be used to
support discretionary transport expenditure on short term capital
projects and the development of medium and longer term
solutions.
h) University of Cumbria Strategic Plan
2007/12
The Board noted that the University of Cumbria had recently
published its five year Strategic Plan from 2007 to 2012. The
Plan consisted of three strategic goals, which were underpinned by
five core themes and a number of key performance
indicators.
The Board welcomed the news that during September 2007 the
University had made good progress in respect of recruitment; and
that there was a clear indication that the University would make a
significant capital investment in West Cumbria as part of its
Estates Strategy.
i) National Skills Academy for Nuclear – Announcement
on Location
The Board noted that on 24 September 2007, Skills Minister David
Lammy had announced that the Head Office for National Skills
Academy for Nuclear would be located in Cumbria. The decision
had been made by an employer – led shadow board; and premises were
now being sourced.
The Board was advised that the Skills Academy was a wholly owned
subsidiary of Cogent, the Sector Skills Council for the chemicals,
pharmaceuticals, nuclear, oil and gas, petroleum and polymer
industries. It would assist employers in the Nuclear industry
to tackle the current and future skills barriers and challenges
that they face in relation to Government’s changing nuclear
agenda.
The Chief Executive reported that the Agency was active in the
development of the project and that a member of NWDA staff was
seconded to provide support.
j) Cumbria Vision – Appointment of New
Chairman
The Chief Executive reported that Roger Liddle had been appointed
as the new Chairman of Cumbria Vision, to replace David Brockbank
who would step down from the position on 30 November 2007.
The Board took the opportunity to thank David for his excellent
chairmanship, which had helped to establish a strategic body for
Cumbria.
k) Carlisle
The Board was reminded that following the floods in January 2005
which had a dramatic economic effect on Carlisle/North Cumbria,
John Prescott, the then Deputy Prime Minister, had launched the
Regeneration prospectus, Carlisle Renaissance. The Board
noted since then that real progress had been slow and in particular
the private sector had become frustrated. The Board was
reminded that Carlisle had been identified as one of the
cities/towns for growth in the RES.
The Chief Executive reported that, given the circumstances he
and the NWDA Chairman had held a meeting with over 30 private
sector representatives as well as representatives from Cumbria
Council and Carlisle City Council. It was clear that there
was a need to develop a prioritised economic regeneration action
plan for the Carlisle City Region, to be led by the private
sector. To help to deliver this, a leadership group, from the
private sector, was being established, which would be supported by
the local authorities.
l) Proposed Measures to Address the Problems Facing
Farming and Allied Businesses in the Region following the recent
FMD Outbreak in Surrey
The Board noted that since 3 August 2007 Foot and Mouth Disease
(FMD) had created significant cash flow issues for businesses that
were unable to access the market place at a time of prime market
value. The Board was advised that SWRDA had already agreed a
financial support package and other RDAs were working up similar
packages to help farmers and allied businesses.
Within the NW, calls for support had come from a number of
agricultural organisations, including a request for support for a
regional marketing campaign for lamb.
Given the above the Agency had decided to put together a
proposed package of support that would provide:
- Business support brokered by Business Link.
- Support for increased marketing to the consumer.
- Support to farming benevolent charities.
The Chief Executive reported that since planning this activity
Hilary Benn the Secretary of State for the Environment had
announced, on 8 October 2007, a £12.5m package of support for
farmers in England affected by the current movement restrictions.
The Secretary of State had also outlined a number of measures to
relieve the burden of red tape on farmers affected.
The Board decided that the Agency should proceed with its
planned support activity, given that:
- Defra had made no provision for business support to assist
these businesses in financial planning or marketing.
- The regional marketing of lamb was a ‘quick win’ within the
region that would deal with immediate problems and increase
consumer awareness.
- Negotiation with the Farming Help charities was already
underway prior to the Secretary of State’s announcement, to which
the RDAs had no prior access.
The Board therefore agreed Agency investment to provide a
package of financial support as described above.
m) Manchester Economic
Commission
The Board noted that a Commission of globally and nationally high
profile economists and business leaders had been engaged by AGMA
and Manchester Enterprises to provide an independent review of
Manchester’s economy. The Agency was providing support to the
Commission.
The Commission would be chaired by Sir Tom McKillop, Chairman of
the Royal Bank of Scotland; and its remit would be to:
- Provide a shared evidence base that would be used to underpin
policy choices in respect of future priorities for strategic
investment and raise understanding across the Manchester City
region (and other City Regions) about how the economy and sectors
work.
- Establish a replicable model to assess and understand the
future development of the City Region’s economy.
- Offer early input into the forthcoming RES review and hence
provide a valuable contribution to the debate on what more needs to
be done or changed to ensure that both the City Region and North
West economies are able to compete effectively with their economic
peers.
A final report would be published in August 2008.
n) New East Manchester: Regeneration Company of the
Year
The Board welcomed the news that New East Manchester (NEM) had
recently been awarded Regeneration Agency of the year in the
Regeneration and Renewal Awards. The judges had noted that
the URC’s achievements were substantial, with around 74,300 sq m of
business and retail floorspace being built and occupied; 3000 jobs
being created; and more than 3500 homes having been constructed or
being built. In addition GCSE A to C grade passes in the area
had increased from 24% to 49%. Most importantly more local
residents had stated that they were happy with their neighbourhood
(68% in 2005 compared to 46% in 1999).
Although some of the achievements were physical the judges of
the competition had acknowledged that the URC’s programmes had
focused on social issues and that education and skills were
particularly targeted. The judges commended NEM on its broad
base and the strong social element to its agenda, successfully
combining physical investment and physical change with community
involvement and development of the social capital base of
residents.
The Board noted that Liverpool Vision was a finalist in the
competition.
o) Regeneration and the Race Equality
Duty
The Board noted that the Commission for Racial Equality (CRE) had
recently published a report of a formal investigation into
Regeneration and Race Equality Duty in England, Scotland and
Wales. The investigation was led by CRE Commissioner
Julia Chain; and had been conducted in response to allegations of
unequal distribution of funds, failure to consult ethnic minority
groups, and concern that regeneration did not adequately take into
account the disadvantages experienced by some ethnic
groups.
The Board noted that the investigation had concentrated largely
on the practice of local authorities in England, Scotland and
Wales; and RDAs in England; had looked at whether regeneration
spending was helping to promote integration between different
ethnic groups; and had considered how the race equality duty had
influenced Regeneration.
The Board noted that the Commissioners had made 51
recommendations aimed at local authorities; RDAs; the Audit
Commission, Audit Scotland and the Wales Audit Office; and the
Commission for Equality and Human Rights; as well as a number of
other organisations. For RDAs specifically, the
recommendations were as follows:
- If it was not already the case, RDAs should ensure that the
promotion of racial equality and good race relations was
appropriately embedded in key regeneration strategies and supported
by a timetabled action plan.
- Leadership should be demonstrated through the promotion of the
business case for racial equality among private sector partners and
local businesses and promotion of the sustainability agenda in a
way that meaningfully includes racial equality and good race
relations. If this was not the case, equality champions at
corporate and departmental levels should be appointed and supported
to help promote the mainstreaming of the race equality duty.
- Necessary steps should be taken to mainstream racial equality
across the organisation and ensure that this work was properly
resourced and built into the corporate performance framework.
- The extent to which the organisation’s race equality duty was
incorporated into existing and proposed regeneration programmes and
accompanying guidance should be reviewed.
The Board was advised that there were also a number of generic
recommendations to be applied to RDAs around impact assessment,
ethnic monitoring and data collection; community engagement; and
partnerships and procurement.
The Board was reassured that the Agency already had Equality
Champions in place across the Agency as well as a range of activity
in place to address some of the recommendations above. Also
the newly re-focused Equality and Diversity team would enable the
Agency to raise its game, particularly in respect of the Race
Equality duty; and the Agency would continue to develop this
agenda, under the guidance of the Equality and Diversity Sub
Committee, taking into account the recommendations from the CRE
investigation as appropriate.
m) 2012 Games – Business
Opportunities
The Board noted that the London Development Agency was working with
the Olympic delivery organisations, DBERR and all Regions and
Nations to develop a UK-wide Electronic Brokerage Service (EBS) to
improve the accessibility of 2012 contracts to all UK
companies. Olympic procurers would be encouraged to open up
their supply chains and advertise their contracts on
EBS. The Board was advised that RDA Chief Executives
had agreed that RDAs should support this, subject to reassurance
that the costs would be shared equally between all Nations and
Regions. Consequently the Agency was working with LDA and
Business Link Northwest to deliver an operational model for the
implementation of EBS in the NW, so that companies, through
Business Link support would be able to build their capacity to
compete for 2012 contracts.
n) 2012 Golf Open
Championships
The Chief Executive reported that the R&A had announced that
the Royal Lytham and St Annes Golf course would host the 2012 Open
Golf Championship. It would also support the Preston Guild in
the same year, with which the Agency would be developing programme
support in order to ensure its success. The Board agreed that
this was excellent news for the region.
o) Policy
Framework
The Board was reminded that the wide range of policies, procedures
and processes which the Agency had in existence had been cited as
an organisational strength in NAO’s Independent Performance
Assessment. The Board noted that the Agency had now
structured its policies and procedures into one corporate portfolio
to ensure consistency of quality; compliance in terms of
legislation and governance; and ease of reference.
p) Accommodation
The Chief Executive reported that a recent review of the Agency’s
accommodation requirements had highlighted that there were
opportunities for efficiency savings, as well as pressure on the
space at Renaissance House which had now surpassed its maximum
operational capacity. In addition the transfer of the ERDF
function from GONW would result in additional personnel to be
accommodated. Proposals to address this had been scrutinised
by Sir Martin Harris, on behalf of the Board. The Board
agreed the proposed revised accommodation arrangements subject to
DBERR approval.
q) Staffing Issues
The Board noted that following discussions between the NWDA Chief
Executive and the Capital of Culture Company, Bernice Law would
take up a secondment position as the Culture Company’s Chief
Operating Officer.
94/07 FINANCE DIRECTOR’S REPORT
The Board noted the Agency’s financial position for the period
ending 31 August 2007.
The Board was also advised of the following:
Administration
RDA Chief Executives had agreed in principle to the level of
administrative savings to be delivered by the RDAs collectively
across the three year planning period (2008/09 to
2010/11). In addition each RDA was required to reduce
expenditure on administration to below 10%.
Prompt Payment
In August 97% of undisputed invoice payments were made within the
30 day prompt payment criteria, against an annual target of
95%. The Board noted that prompt payment had been
steadily improving since the beginning of the financial year, with
year to date performance at 94%.
EU Objective 2
The Board received an update on the recent European Commission (EC)
audit of the Northwest Objective 2 Programme.
The Board was reminded that, in September 2006, it had approved
the Clayton Brook (East Manchester) project, involving the
relocation of Greggs Bakery to free up land for housing
development. Further costs had since been identified in
respect of the Agency's contribution to professional fees
associated with delivering the project. The Board agreed that
the investment should be revised.
The Board noted the delegations for the period 10 August 2007 to
21 September 2007.
The Board approved the delegation in respect of “Advanced
Manufacturing Supply Chain – Automotive”.
94/ DATE AND TIME OF THE NEXT MEETING
The next meeting will take place at 12.30pm on 15 November 2007
at the Oakmere Conference Centre, Liverpool.